The installation is lacking in feedback for the user.
Elements of the install leave the machine sitting whilst the screen shows no progress or activity at all. The hard drive is active all the time but there needs to me more visual feedback for the end user.
An upgrade took over 3 hours with most of it running at one point - verifying compatibility - It looked like it had basically hung up (other than hard drive access) Hours later the file copy started.
The start up screen I hope will change but again complete barebones.
Things in general look good but the install needs a lot of work, many Linux installers look much slicker than the latest and greatest Windows (I am a window/linux user so please don't start any wars!!)
---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane.
http://windowshelp.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.mspx?mid=65b9bd7e-f6ab-4679-82bd-5e8c6190ec17&dg=microsoft.public.windows.vista.installation_setup

Installation Feedback
Its still a work in progress, but any issues you have, report them using the Feedback link on your Vista desktop. -- -- Andre Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
"Chrismoo" wrote in message
The installation is lacking in feedback for the user.
Elements of the install leave the machine sitting whilst the screen shows no progress or activity at all. The hard drive is active all the time but there needs to me more visual feedback for the end user.
An upgrade took over 3 hours with most of it running at one point - verifying compatibility - It looked like it had basically hung up (other than hard drive access) Hours later the file copy started.
The start up screen I hope will change but again complete barebones.
Things in general look good but the install needs a lot of work, many Linux installers look much slicker than the latest and greatest Windows (I am a window/linux user so please don't start any wars!!)
---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane.
http://windowshelp.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.mspx?mid=65b9bd7e-f6ab-4679-82bd-5e8c6190ec17&dg=microsoft.public.windows.vista.installation_setup
Well, I have to agree with Chrismoo, There is a need for a way of feedback input during installation as I couldn't get it finished, despite numerous downloads, DVD burning and so on. Too many error messages with non-descriptive numbers. The earlier versions of Longhorn were easier to install. So at least in my case, I will wait for another built ormaybe I order DVD. Marek
"Andre Da Costa [Extended64]" wrote:
Its still a work in progress, but any issues you have, report them using the Feedback link on your Vista desktop. -- -- Andre Windows Connected | http://www.windowsconnected.com Extended64 | http://www.extended64.com Blog | http://www.extended64.com/blogs/andre http://spaces.msn.com/members/adacosta
"Chrismoo" wrote in message The installation is lacking in feedback for the user.
Elements of the install leave the machine sitting whilst the screen shows no progress or activity at all. The hard drive is active all the time but there needs to me more visual feedback for the end user.
An upgrade took over 3 hours with most of it running at one point - verifying compatibility - It looked like it had basically hung up (other than hard drive access) Hours later the file copy started.
The start up screen I hope will change but again complete barebones.
Things in general look good but the install needs a lot of work, many Linux installers look much slicker than the latest and greatest Windows (I am a window/linux user so please don't start any wars!!)
---------------- This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then click "I Agree" in the message pane.
http://windowshelp.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.mspx?mid=65b9bd7e-f6ab-4679-82bd-5e8c6190ec17&dg=microsoft.public.windows.vista.installation_setup
Windows Vista
User login
Related topics
- Does Vista Basic interface use new desktop composition engin
- Screen Resolution on Inspiron 8600 w/ ATI Radeon 9600 Displa
- Post It Note Gadget - Move - How?
- Where to find the vista CTP's
- Windows Too Large (Sometimes)
- Fx5200 on KM4M - video severely corrupt
- transfer ??
- TECHTAK Today
- Wireless on a laptop
- please help
- RDP Certificate for Vista
- BSOD in TCPIP.SYS with IRQL less/equal
- NetGear WG311 v2 and NVIDIA GeoForce FX5200
- Page Fault on Install
- do i lost my file, if i install the Vista Beta 2
- Wireless network
- Windows Vista file size
- 3com 3c940 nic p4p800
- Audio Trouble
- aero glass w/945gm chipset
- Installation errors
- installing vista beta2
- vista driver not compatible with vista
- Only Work in Safe Mode
- Vista OS
- Can't install HP PSC1610 printer
- Ati Radeon 9600 64MB code 43
- can't rename folders
- Hard drive never stops running
- Setting up Network
- Intel Pro1000 PM Jumbo Frames
- Defender does not start in Vista Beta2
- explorer
- RCI In August?
- Can you FAX through DSL?
- Netapp & Vista
- New ribbon UI
- Some gui changes